Freedom Flix

Ariz. Supreme Court Declares Edu. Choice Program Constitutional

 

 

The Arizona Supreme Court announced today that it will not review a unanimous Court of Appeals’ decision that declared Arizona’s Empowerment Scholarship Account (ESA) Program passes constitutional muster. Today’s decision removes any lingering uncertainty about the program’s constitutionality.

“Arizona’s ESA Program is changing lives and improving educational outcomes for more than 700 special-needs students currently participating in the program,” said Tim Keller, Executive Director of the Institute for Justice Arizona Chapter and the Institute’s lead attorney defending the program in court. “The Arizona Supreme Court’s decision is a huge victory for the families participating in the ESA Program.”

Austin Fox is one example of the difference this program is making in students’ lives. Now a high school senior, Austin—who has Asperger’s syndrome—was ready to drop out of his public high school in 10th grade. But the opportunity to participate in the ESA program, and to choose a school for himself, convinced Austin to stay in school. Austin’s new-found academic success and high SAT and ACT scores means he is college bound upon graduation. Austin’s mom, Crystal credits the ESA program with “saving Austin’s life.”

The Institute for Justice represented Crystal and Austin in this case. Along with several other parents and children, the Foxes intervened in the lawsuit, filed by the Arizona Education Association and the Arizona School Boards Association, to defend the ESA program, which is the first of its kind in the nation.

“Arizona’s ESA Program is a publicly-funded education savings program that gives parents more control over their special needs child’s education than any other private school choice program in the country,” explained Keller. “Arizona’s ESA Program differs from traditional publicly-funded scholarship programs by giving parents of special-needs children a full menu of educational options in which to choose to spend the funds.”

Under the ESA Program, participating parents receive quarterly deposits into an “empowerment account” in an amount slightly less than their child’s previous public school would have received to educate their child. Parents can then use those funds for a wide array of educational options, including payment of tuition or fees at a private school, purchasing educational therapies or services from a licensed or accredited provider, hiring an accredited tutor, or even paying for individual classes or extracurricular activities at a public school.

“Arizona has always been a national leader in offering families educational choice,” said Institute President and General Counsel William Mellor. “Today’s decision finally and fully vindicates the ESA Program’s constitutionality. The Court of Appeals’ decision now joins a growing list of state courts, including Ohio, Wisconsin, and most recently Indiana, to vindicate the parental right to choose the educational environment that best suits their child’s unique educational needs.”

The Institute for Justice is the nation’s leading law firm defending educational choice programs and is actively involved in litigation to protect programs in Alabama, Colorado, New Hampshire, and North Carolina. The Institute for Justice previously successfully defended Arizona’s popular tax-credit-scholarship programs in the Arizona Supreme Court in 1999 and again in the U.S. Supreme Court in 2009.

Learn more! http://www.ij.org/arizona-education-savings

Read more

 

Embed on your site:




Freedom Flix

The Institute for Justice is always looking for new ways to promote the message of freedom. To that end, IJ produced the following videos in-house to tell the stories of our clients and their fight for individual liberty.

None of this — the cases or these videos — would be possible without the continued generosity of our donors. We hope you enjoy them and share them with those who need a little inspiration.

Subscribe to our videos via iTunes or YouTube.


   Why Can't Chuck Get His Business Off the Ground? (5:05)
Why Can't Chuck Get His Business Off the Ground?
   Arizona School Choice Fight Goes to U.S. Supreme Court (3:22)
   Camp Politics: Training the Next Generation of Censors Since 1974 (3:04)
   License to Describe: Defeating Washington D.C.'s Tour Guide Licensing Scheme (2:33)
In Washington, D.C., talking without a license can land you in jail for 90 days.
   Free the Monks & Free Enterprise: Saint Joseph Abbey v. Louisiana State Board of Embalmers and Funeral Directors (2:39)
Under Louisiana law, it is a crime for anyone but a licensed funeral director to sell funeral merchandise, which includes caskets. To sell caskets legally, the monks of Saint Joseph Abbey would have to abandon their calling for one full year to apprenti
   Kelo: Five Years Later (3:51)
   Where does the alphabet end? (0:32)
The Institute for Justice believes that parents, not bureaucrats should choose what school kids attend.
   Freeing Small Farms: Minnesota Farms Fight Protectionism (2:48)
Farmers should not be threatened with 90 days in jail and $1,000 in fines for selling pumpkins or Christmas trees grown outside city limits. Yet that is the law in Lake Elmo, Minn. On December 1, 2009, the Lake Elmo City Council declared that it would beg
   Citizens United Debate Trailer (1:17)
On 6-24-10, IJ's Steve Simpson and Cato's Ilya Shapiro debated Loyola's Richard Hasen and AU's Jamin Raskin at the American University Washington College of Law. They discussed various aspects of the Citizens United decision.
   Policing for Profit - The Abuse of Civil Asset Forfeiture (2:30)
If police suspect that you committed a crime, they can arrest you and put you on trial. But if police suspect your car was involved in a crime, they can take it, sell it and, in most places, pocket the proceeds to pad their budgets.
   City of Dallas Bans Signs for Small Business (0:53)
Under a Dallas law enacted in 2008, businesses are prohibited from putting signs in the upper two-thirds of any window or glass door, and no more than 15 percent of any window or glass door may be covered by signs.
   IJ's Chip Mellor Discusses Government Mandated Licensing With John Stossel (9:58)
   IJ's Scott Bullock discusses civil forfeiture abuse with John Stossel (6:51)
   Hanging by a Thread: Defending Economic Liberty in Texas (2:29)
Eyebrow threading is a booming industry in Texas. But state bureaucrats are making it impossible to continue practicing this ancient art.
   Teaching is Not a Crime: Challenging Virginia's Unconstitutional Regulation of Yoga Teacher Training (3:05)
Anyone in Virginia can do yoga, and anyone can teach yoga. But, incredibly, it is illegal to teach people to teach yoga. Yoga-teacher training is just the latest target of vocational school licensing laws that require countless entrepreneurs to ask the go
   Saving Lives: Challenging the Ban on Compensating Bone Marrow Donors (2:49)
   Free to Design: Florida Entrepreneurs Take On the Interior Design Cartel (3:27)
A small group of well-funded industry insiders led by the American Society of Interior Designers has been relentless in its pursuit of ever more restrictive laws. Studies have shown that interior design regulations result in higher prices, less variety, a
   San Tan Flat & The Fight Against Arbitrary Government Power (3:07)
   The Campaign Finance Bait & Switch: Fair Elections Now Act (1:12)
They're at it again. The same special interests who for decades have called for government-funded political campaigns?what amounts to welfare for politicians?are again pushing something called the Fair Elections Now Act . . . a proposal that would create
   Andrea Weck & School Choice (3:51)

Email Address
Please enter a valid email address
Share

Institute for Justice
901 N. Glebe Road, Suite 900
Arlington, VA 22203
Tel 703.682.9320, Fax 703.682.9321
© 1997-2014